Why basically everyone should be screened for an anxiety disorder

Image for article titled Why Basically Everyone Should Be Screened for an Anxiety Disorder

photo: fizkes (Shutterstock)

The persistent pandemic, the increasing crimean uncertain economy: all good reasons to visit your doctor for an examination anxiety, or so the federal government says. The The advice is not only aimed at people who already suffer from mental health problems, tThis week, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, an advisory group formed by the Department of Health and Human Services, issued a recommendation that all Americans under 65 are screened for anxiety. (This is probably one normal and good thing that a government recommendsright?)

Part of the task force’s goal is to uncover hidden or underreported mental health disorders so they don’t go untreated, and one of its main findings is that, unsurprisingly, the upheaval of recent years has made many people feel it anxious. As noted, tthe council cites inflation. crime rates, fear of illness and loss of loved ones to COVID-19 as possible reasons why he might be anxious, but feel free to add global warming, warming fascism and the continued existence of spiders on the list if you I like. Whatever the cause, the percentage of adults who report recent symptoms of an anxiety or depressive disorder rose from 36.4% to 41.5% between August 2020 and February 2021, according to research cited by the group.

Here’s what you need to know about taking an anxiety test.

How does anxiety disorder screening work?

It’s not mandatory, but doctors across the country are expected to start prioritizing anxiety testing in response to the panel’s advice, so if you make an appointment for a check-up, your doctor will probably be ready to do the initial screening. This will they usually take the form of a questionnaire that your doctor will use to collect the signs you may have an anxiety disorder. From there, you may be referred to a mental health specialist to complete the diagnosis or may be told that you do not have symptoms of the disorder.

If you are finally diagnosed with an anxiety disorder, things get a little murky. The standard treatment is therapy and/or medication, which they have it has been proven to be effective for most people afterwards just a few months-but if you will have access at the level of treatment you need is anything but guaranteed. As Dr. Jeffrey Staab, psychiatrist and chair of the department of psychiatry and psychology at the Mayo Clinic (not a member of the task force), points out tthe New York Times, The USA there is a lack of mental health professionals at all levels, and a screening program won’t be very helpful if it doesn’t lead to treatment for people who need it.

This is not the only potential pitfall. “Wen providers say, ‘You must have a disorder, here, take this,’ we could face an overprescribing problem,” Staab says. “But the opposite scenario is that we have many people suffering who should not be suffering. Both outcomes are possible.”

Because one anxiety screening can help systemic struggle racism

According to task force member Lori Pbert, a clinical psychologist and professor at the University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, another potential benefit of mass screenings for anxiety disorders is to combat racism, implicit bias and other equality issues of systemic health. Sbelieving everyone, more than just those which seems like they could fit in the typical image of an anxiety patientit could ultimately lead to a more equitable distribution of mental health resources. To some extent, anyway: the distribution of treatment and resources is likely to favor those who actually have a primary care doctor they visit regularly.

What about people over 65?

The task force did not recommend anxiety testing for people over 65 because, “Symptoms of anxiety are similar to normal signs of aging, such as fatigue and generalized pain.” This suggests to me that we should develop better tests for anxiety to be able to guarantee this old people don’t suffer unnecessarily, but I’m no medical researcher.

Leave a Reply